How Neutrality Lost its Appeal as a Political Strategy: Sweden and Finland’s Accesion to NATO
Abstract
NATO is about to embrace two Scandinavian countries as new members, even though Sweden and Finland opted for neutrality during the Cold War. In the political turmoil of the second half of 20th century, those two countries preferred to stay on the sidelines. The struggle between two poles of global politics raged on, yet even after more than three decades since the collapse of Soviet Union, they choose not to commit to the Western alliance. After a period during which existence of NATO was questioned, it is imperative to explain how once again the alliance attracts newer members to its fold. Evidently, Russia-Ukraine war was the trigger behind the change in strategies but the question how this conflict is different than has other Cold War engagement remains. This paper investigates how NATO membership became the optimal strategy for previously non-aligned countries in Europe even after a bipolar world order faded away. A game theory approach outlining the choices and payoffs for Russia versus Sweden and Finland will be used to understand the changing strategies for all actors.
Metrics
References
Allan, D. (2020). The Minsk conundrum: Western policy and Russia’s war in Eastern Ukraine. Chatham House. https://www.chathamhouse.org/sites/default/files/2020-05-22-minsk-conundrum-allan.pdf
Anderson, M. S. (2014). Peter the Great. Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315837765
Antola, E. (2005). Finland. Foreign ministries in the European Union: Integrating diplomats. in B. Hocking, & D. Spence eds. Foreign ministries in the European Union (p. 95-110). Palgrave Macmillan.
Borawski, J. (1996). Partnership for peace and beyond. Foreign Affairs, 71(2), 233-246. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2623432
Brose, C. (2019). The new revolution in military affairs: War's sci-fi future. Foreign Affairs, (98), 122-134.
Budjeryn, M. (2014). The breach: Ukraine’s territorial integrity and the Budapest memorandum. Nuclear Proliferation International History Project, (3), 1-5.
Cecire, M. (2022). The Russian Invasion of Ukraine. Foreign Policy Research Institute.
Chernev, B. (2011). The Brest-Litovsk moment: Self-Determination discourse in Eastern Europe before Wilsonianism. Diplomacy & Statecraft, 22(3), 369-387. https://doi.org/10.1080/09592296.2011.599635 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09592296.2011.599635
Çınar, B. (2022). Operation Weserübung Nord: German invasion of Norway, 1940. Bölgesel Araştırmalar Dergisi, 6(2), 670-713.
Dahl, A.-S. (2013). To be or not to be neutral: Swedish security strategy in the Post-Cold War era. in G. S. Efraim Inbar ed. The National Security of Small States in a Changing World (p. 175-196). Routledge.
Ferreira-Pereira, L. C. (2006). Inside the fence but outside the walls: Austria, Finland and Sweden in the post-cold war security architecture. Cooperation and Conflict, 41(1), 99-122. https://doi.org/ 10.1177/0010836706060938 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0010836706060938
Fischer, T. J. (2016). Introduction: Neutrality and nonalignment in world politics during the cold war. Journal of Cold War Studies, 18(4), 4-11. https://doi.org/ 10.1162/JCWS_a_00677 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/JCWS_a_00677
Forsberg, T. (2023). "Finland and Sweden’s road to NATO. Current History, 122(842), 89-94. https://doi.org/10.1525/curh.2023.122.842.89 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/curh.2023.122.842.89
Haugevik, K. S. (2022). Security debates and partnership choices in the Nordic states: From differentiation to alignment. Norwegian Institute of Social Srudies.
Hill, F. A. (2022). The world Putin wants: How distortions about the past feed delusions about the future. Foreign Affairs, (101), 108-123.
Jankowski, T. A. (2023). Geopolitical upheaval in the Post-Soviet space: The “Near Abroad” tested by the war in Ukraine. Network for Strategic Analysis.
Judt, T. (2005). Postwar: A history of Europe since 1945. Pinguin Books.
Karatnycky, A. (2005). Ukraine's orange revolution. Foreign Affairs, (84), 35-52. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/20034274
Kissinger, H. (1994). Diplomacy. Simon & Schuster.
Lundmark, M. (2022). The evolution towards the partial strategic autonomy of Sweden’s essential security interests. Defense and Peace Economics, 33(4), 399-420. https://doi.org/10.1080/10242694.2021.1992713 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10242694.2021.1992713
Mankoff, J. (2021). Russia in the era of great power competition. The Washington Quarterly, 44(3), 107-125. https://doi.org/ 10.1080/0163660x.2021.1970905 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0163660X.2021.1970905
Menon, R. A. (2000). Russia's ruinous Chechen war. Foreign Affairs, (79), 32-44. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/20049639
Mikhelidze, N. (2009). After the 2008 Russia-Georgia War: Implications for the wider Caucasus. The International Spectator, 44(3), 27-42. https://doi.org/10.1080/03932720903148807 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03932720903148807
TASS. (2023, 7 7). Russia hopes 'blinding Russophobia' will come to an end in Finland, says Kremlin spokesman. TASS: Russian News Agency. https://tass.com/society/1643845
Taylor, A. (1974). The Struggle for Mastery in Europe: 1848-1918. Oxford University Press.
Wedin, L. (2019). L’île de Gotland. Clé de la mer Baltique. Stratégique, 1(2), 103-115. https://doi.org/10.3917/strat.121.0103 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3917/strat.121.0103
